x close
Click Accept pentru a primi notificări cu cele mai importante știri! Nu, multumesc Accept
Jurnalul.ro Vechiul site Old site English Version Propaganda for the Mafia

Propaganda for the Mafia

de Ion Cristoiu    |    11 Mar 2008   •   00:00

There is a common aspect between the two national robberies, the privatization and the retrocession, through which the state property, the result of entire generations that helped the communist state to build factories, dams, channels, schools, kindergartens and multiplied the value of certain real estate properties.



There is a common aspect between the two national robberies, the privatization and the retrocession, through which the state property, the result of entire generations that helped the communist state to build factories, dams, channels, schools, kindergartens and multiplied the value of certain real estate properties.

In both cases, the Bolshevik propaganda, which the new Romanian big bugs (most of the former security members) successfully use, created the necessary environment for legal stealing.

The property transfer in the case of the privatization took place based on the hypocrite primitive anti-communism, because the ones who had taken advantage from the communism promoted it. One of the components of this propaganda was the denial of all the economical successes of the socialist state. If the Romanian industry were just a “junkyard”, no one would have asked why the factories were sold for nothing, even though some of them would have needed only minor investments to rival with the ones in the Occidental industry.

Another step was taken when the privatization was transformed into a fetish. As the world history of economy shows, the state property wasn’t the worst thing about the socialist economy. The free competition was the worst aspect of the socialist economy. As long as everything was centralized and planned, the managers of the socialist enterprises were not interested in the efficiency of their work. When the transition to the market economy was made, the individual, the corporatist and the state property had to abide by the laws of free competition. The state was interested in hiring efficient managers. Actually, the recent tendencies in the modern capitalism are to eliminate the visible owner that is also a manager and to replace him with hundreds of shareholders. The general assembly designates the administration council and a PDG able to bring profit.

The primitive anti-communist propaganda was used successfully in the case of the second national robbery (retrocession) as well. Some people will be amazed to see the anti-communist hysteria that appeared during the Basescu-Tariceanu regime. An absurd hysteria if we think that the Romanian President and PM fight for the position of anti-communist archangel even if there are no communist cells in this country. This is a ridiculous hypostasis if we take into account that neither of them had to suffer in the communist Romania. The anti-communist hysteria was helpful for the retrocession Mafia. Some claims were natural. However, there were a lot of them based on false documents made by the retrocession Mafia. If the communist state was a criminal one, all its results were questionable. The clerks and the judges were put under an extraordinary psychological pressure. Any attempt to check the documents, any attempt to save a social-cultural object that proposed sums of money in return for the damages was quickly denounced by the propaganda for the retrocession Mafia.

P.S. Whenever he feels the need to urinate on the heads of his enemies in the media and in the politics, Traian Basescu runs to “Sfertul Academic”, his personal WC at the Radio Romania Actualitati. He is sure that Paul Grigoriu won’t ask why his sly is open. That is the only way in which I can explain the dialogue on the 7th of March 208, when Traian Basescu said there are corrupt journalists that started a campaign against him in the Omar Hayssam issue without being asked to prove that.

×
Subiecte în articol: that english were state