With 497 votes for, 93 against and 71 abstentions, the members of the European Parliament have approved Romaniaâs adherence to the European Union, in Strasbourg.
|
|
GREEN LIGHT. 500 out of the 600 members of the European Parliament taking part in the voting, voted for Romaniaâs adherence to the EU. |
At the end of the voting, the authorities in Sofia, as well as the ones in Bucharest looked relieved, at least for the present. The adherence treaty calendar, approved in December 2004 by the big-guns of the European Union, is still valid, the treaty will be signed in less than two weeks time. A first monitoring report will be made public in the next autumn, and will show whether these countries continue the reforms in the rhythm asked by the Europeans.
The two parliamentary groups reasoned their decision by invoking not only the problems in Bucharest and in Sofia, but also some communication problems between the two European institutions: the Parliament (the Unionâs Legislative) and the Commission (the Unionâs Executive). To be more precise, the Euro-deputies say they didnât receive from the Commission enough information on the implications caused by the two statesâ adherence on the communitarian budget. The cost of Romaniaâs and Bulgariaâs adherences has been estimated at 44.3 billion euros, one third of which is paid by Germany, and, for the countries that adhered to the EU last year, 40 billion euros have been awarded from the communitarian budget.
THE PROCEDURE. "The greens" and the conservatives have actually used a procedure maneuver. They said it was not a normal thing for the members of the European Parliament in the Legislativeâs Budget Commission to present them the financial aspects of the expansion in 2007. They would have liked the members of the Commission to present these aspects directly to them.
However, the EPP didnât ask anymore for the postponing of the decision regarding the adherence of the two states, the leader of the group saying he received all the wanted information and guarantees on the financial impact of the new expansion. This wasnât the decision of the ecologists. They kept their opinion regarding the postponing, but abruptly changed their reason, mentioning the readiness level of Romania and Bulgaria. Daniel Bendt-Cohn said about Romania that, even though there have been some progresses made in the economical area, Romania still has a lot to make up for the press freedom and corruption. In these conditions, being supported by the ecologists only, the postponing motion has been unhesitatingly rejected.
Translated By SORIN BALAN