Unbelievable - Paul Goma Is Dead for the Authorities

The scandal caused by the confessions of Nicolae Plesita, the former Security General, isn’t over. The fact that a TV station managed to determine one of the heads of the Security to confess the terrorizing methods used against the political opposites is a performance itself.

Unbelievable - Paul Goma Is Dead for the Authorities The scandal caused by the confessions of Nicolae Plesita, the former Security General, isn’t over. The fact that a TV station managed to determine one of the heads of the Security to confess the terrorizing methods used against the political opposites is a performance itself. The public finds out the methods used for crashing any form of protest against the communist regime from a former head-torturer. They find out about the brutal breakings of the fundamental human rights and freedoms.

The National Council of Audio-Video (NCAV) appealed to the Prosecutor’s Office of the High Court of Justice because Plesita’s statements are evident proofs that incriminate the former Security General. NCAV also sent to the Prosecutor’s Office the tape with the respective TV show.

The case went to the penal and crime investigation section, having the number 130 in 2005. Approximately six months after the broadcasting of the show, Prosecutor Ilie Mihai Eduard, member of the high institution, presented his conclusions. These are in fact the second part of the "Plesita" scandal.

PROSECUTOR’S OFFICE. Nicolae Plesita gets away with it.

THE ANSWER. After thorough investigations, the Prosecutor drew up a "resolution" dated 13 June 2005. Ilie Mihai Eduard ascertains that "the constitutive elements of the apprised facts are not met by the contents of the tape". What are the bases of this direct-effect decision, a positive one for Nicolae Plesita? The Prosecutor says that Plesita’s statements cannot be considered as incriminatory proofs, because the conversation between Dan Diaconescu, the TV show’s producer, and the former Security General "started from his memories". Mr. Prosecutor explains the relevancy of this fact. Therefore, one’s own statement, even if part of the memory, cannot be the reason for starting an investigation. This probably means that the Prosecutor considers the memories as fictive, and, due to it being literature, the author cannot be held responsible. The odd interpretations that the Resolution contains, continue. In the following lines, the same wrong measures are taken against the facts confessed by Nicola Plesita. We will integrally show this passage of an amazing logic and knowledge of the Romanian factionalism from the Prosecutor.

THE DECEASE. "The questions of the TV show’s producer also regarded the Paul Goma case, when Plesita admitted he used violence during the investigation. This doesn’t contain any > in the meaning presented at the 4th paragraph of the 324th article of the Penal Code even if the author matched his action with a >. This aspect cannot be taken as an admiration for his work, taking into account that Nicolae Plesita had in mind an explanation regarding the missing of the report with the causality condition between his action and Paul Goma’s death. The conclusion comes from his answer to the producer: >."

THE CONCLUSION. Therefore, Prosecutor Eduard Mihai Ilie sent Paul Goma into the world of the righteous. Fortunately, the writer lives in Paris and sees the Prosecutor’s acts as implicit. The reasons in the Resolution are put there roughly - black turns white and the living turns dead. Without any nervousness, the Prosecutor attached the famous NUP (not taking any legal action) etiquette to the file, letting Nicolae Plesita as a not guilty person. Who is going to do the same thing for Prosecutor Eduard Mihai Ilie?